@article{JGO15975,
author = {Marco Ceresoli and Niccolò Allievi and Federico Coccolini and Giulia Montori and Paola Fugazzola and Michele Pisano and Massimo Sartelli and Fausto Catena and Luca Ansaloni},
title = {Long-term oncologic outcomes of stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery in malignant left side colonic obstructions: a meta-analysis},
journal = {Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
year = {2017},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: The placement of a metallic stent as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) could represents an option for the treatment of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction in centres with adequate skills. Several meta-analyses demonstrated better short-term outcomes after SBTS when compared with emergency surgery (ES); however, some studies reported a higher local recurrence rate. The aim of the present review is to investigate the long-term outcomes of stent bridge to surgery as compared to ES.
Methods: A systematic review was performed to retrieve studies comparing long-term oncologic outcomes of SBTS and ES. Local and overall recurrence rate, overall and disease-free survival were retrieved and results were expressed as risk ratios.
Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 1,333 patients were included in the analysis. No significant differences were reported in recurrence rate [risk ratio (RR) =1.11; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.84–1.47, P=0.47], 3-year mortality (RR =0.90; 95% CI: 0.73–1.12, P=0.34) and 5-year mortality (RR =1.00; 95% CI: 0.82–1.22, P=0.99). There were no differences among randomized and observational studies.
Conclusions: SBTS has similar long-term oncologic outcomes to ES and in centres with appropriate skill should be considered the best treatment option for left-sided malignant colonic obstructions.},
issn = {2219-679X}, url = {https://jgo.amegroups.org/article/view/15975}
}