Increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake—time to consider a more holistic socio-ecological approach
Editorial

Increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake—time to consider a more holistic socio-ecological approach

Jerrald Lau1,2, Ker-Kan Tan1,2

1Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; 2Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to: Jerrald Lau. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore C/O NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore. Email: jerrald.lau@nus.edu.sg.

Comment on: Hartley C, Chhachhi N, Khader Y, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review using the theoretical domains framework. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023;14:1576-92.


Keywords: Colorectal cancer; theoretical domains framework; socio-ecological approach; cancer screening


Submitted Nov 14, 2022. Accepted for publication Nov 30, 2022. Published online Dec 09, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/jgo-2022-02


In this systematic review, Hartley, Chhachhi, Khader and Farhat employed the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) situated within a socio-ecological approach to explore the landscape of barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within the Eastern Mediterranean (1). Synthesising findings from 116 eligible publications spanning 12 countries, the TDF was used to demonstrate that key domains (such as the lack of knowledge about screening) influencing screening uptake are not one-dimensional, with opportunities to intervene at the individual- (e.g., have not heard of CRC screening), provider- (e.g., low awareness of CRC screening modalities among medical students) and system- (e.g., lack of government awareness campaigns) levels.

Critically, Hartley and colleagues highlighted the importance of considering multifactorial nuances when tackling the problem of getting individuals in the public to uptake CRC screening. While knowledge emerged as the most pertinent factor from the perspective of patients and the public, there were also crucial provider- and system-level gaps such as costs associated with screening and inconvenience of arranging and transporting oneself to a medical appointment. This is consistent with other studies on screening uptake. For example, a recent study from Korea suggested that while behavioural factors influenced health screening in individuals, other broader social determinants (e.g., social welfare budgets) were also significant predictors to be considered (2).

To quote Helen Keller, “Alone we can do so little, together we can do so much.” Ultimately, this review represents a timely reminder that efforts to reduce the healthcare burden of CRC should take a multi-pronged approach. Our mindsets toward promoting CRC screening uptake must evolve from simply seeking to change individuals’ behaviour, to incorporating cultural and infrastructural nudges, and even to national policy-level initiatives that will make screening the societally “easier” choice.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-2022-02/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Scoping Review Using the Theoretical Domains Framework. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-510.
  2. Park SY, Shin YJ. A Multi-level Analysis of Factors Affecting Participation in Health Screenings in Korea: A Focus on Household and Regional Factors. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2022;55:153. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Lau J, Tan KK. Increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake—time to consider a more holistic socio-ecological approach. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023;14(3):1655-1656. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2022-02

Download Citation