Effect of perioperative blood transfusion (BTF) on elderly gastric cancer patients
Letter to the Editor

Effect of perioperative blood transfusion (BTF) on elderly gastric cancer patients

Jinqiang Liu1,2, Kunli Du1, Rui Zhang1, Wei Zhou1, Gaozan Zheng1, Pengfei Wang1, Jianyong Zheng1, Fan Feng1

1Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an, China; 2Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Correspondence to: Fan Feng, PhD; Prof. Jianyong Zheng, PhD. Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, 127 West Changle Road, Xi’an 710032, China. Email: surgeonfengfan@163.com; zhjy68@163.com.

Response to: Zhang M, Feng Q, Wang M. Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on elderly gastric cancer patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024;15:2026-7.


Submitted Jun 27, 2024. Accepted for publication Jul 10, 2024. Published online Aug 26, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-487


We thank Dr. Zhang et al. (1) for their comments on our study regarding the impact of perioperative blood transfusion (BTF) on postoperative complications and prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer, published in the Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Randomization is an effective method to reduce confounding factors among groups, but it is commonly used in prospective studies (2). Our study was a retrospective study, and randomization could not be performed.

In our study, the median follow-up time was only 51 months. However, as of our follow-up date, 63.5% (1,057) of the patients had either died or had been followed up for more than five years. Therefore, it still holds some value as an assessment of long-term outcomes. Of course, we fully agree with Dr. Zhang et al.’s suggestion to continue with longer follow-up to provide more accurate results.

Considering the impact of intraoperative bleeding on prognosis, we grouped the cases based on the cut-off value (300 mL) referenced in previous studies (3). Multiple studies have reported that there is no significant difference in prognosis and complications between laparoscopic and open surgery for gastric cancer patients, hence we did not deem it necessary to perform a stratified analysis based on the surgical approach (4-6).

In our study, 411 patients received BTFs, while only 64 patients received red blood cells (RBCs) alone. The remaining patients received a combination of RBCs and other blood components such as plasma. Due to the small number of patients who received single-component transfusions, further stratified analysis was not feasible. Previous studies on the effects of transfusion volume, timing, and components on prognosis have already been listed in the discussion section of our original text (7). If conditions permit in the future, we will consider conducting a multi-center study to increase the sample size, reduce potential biases, and perform more detailed stratified analyses to obtain more precise results.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8207101617).


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-24-487/coif). All authors report that this study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8207101617). The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Zhang M, Feng Q, Wang M. Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on elderly gastric cancer patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024;15:2026-7. [Crossref]
  2. Streiner DL. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 41: Randomization. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2020;40:439-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Xiao H, Liu W, Quan H, et al. Peri-Operative Blood Transfusion Does Not Influence Overall and Disease-Free Survival After Radical Gastrectomy for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:1489-500. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;321:1983-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Liu F, Huang C, Xu Z, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1590-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:978-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Liu J, Du K, Zhang R, et al. Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on complications and prognosis after radical gastrectomy in elderly patients: a retrospective study of 1,666 cases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024;15:555-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Liu J, Du K, Zhang R, Zhou W, Zheng G, Wang P, Zheng J, Feng F. Effect of perioperative blood transfusion (BTF) on elderly gastric cancer patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024;15(4):2022-2023. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-487

Download Citation